Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3BD556FE.46350849@syntrex.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:39:42 +0200
From: Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: 1.3.3-2: fseek fails on multiples of 1024 (binary mode)
References: <20011021225629 DOT 17478 DOT qmail AT foolabs DOT com> <20011022150648 DOT B10383 AT redhat DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I think I found the problem - is there anyone who can 
test a patch ?

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 03:56:29PM -0700, Derek B. Noonburg wrote:
> >The fseek function appears to behave strangely when both the offset and
> >file size are multiples of 1024.  This is with binary mode files -- I'm
> >calling fopen with "rb", and my test file has no control characters (CR,
> >LF, ^Z) at all.
> 
> This looks like a newlib bug.  I've forwarded this to the newlib mailing
> list.
> 
> In the meantime if anyone wants to look into the problem, a patch would
> be gratefully accepted.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/