Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <007801c159eb$8d5e7910$f365323f@amr.corp.intel.com> From: "Tim Prince" To: "Piyush Kumar" , References: Subject: Re: g++ 3.0.1 and g++ 2.95.3.5 Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 21:47:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Piyush Kumar" To: Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2001 6:08 PM Subject: g++ 3.0.1 and g++ 2.95.3.5 > > I have a project of around (10k lines of C++ which uses lot of templates) > I have right now 2.95.3-5 of gcc installed and today I compiled 3.0.1 > on my machine. The output from g++ 3.0.1 is more than twice slower compared > to 2.95.3-5 with same optimization settings!!! Is it because of my code > or has some one else also seen this before! > > When is g++ 3.0.1 coming to the standard download from the mirror > sites of cygwin(Thru setup.exe) > Haven't you read any of the comments? Do I understand that you're criticizing someone on the cygwin team both for the slowness of 3.0.1 and also for not using it to replace the current mostly working integrated system? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/