Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:56:50 +0100 Resent-Message-ID: <5350-Fri19Oct2001095650+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> X-Resent-Mailer: 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I) Resent-From: David Starks-Browning Resent-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <7242-Fri19Oct2001095311+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> X-Mailer: 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid (via feedmail 9-beta-7 I); VM 6.92 under 21.5 (beta2) "artichoke" XEmacs Lucid MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <002301c15846$93ab0be0$0200a8c0@mike> References: <002301c15846$93ab0be0$0200a8c0 AT mike> From: David Starks-Browning To: "Chuck" CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Workarounds for the pipe character problem Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 09:53:11 +0100 On Friday 19 Oct 01, Chuck writes: > Here are a couple of ways to work around the problem of not being able to > type a pipe character when running bash in a DOS box under windows 95/98/Me > with a non-US keyboard. Why isn't using rxvt instead a sufficient workaround? Is there is any reason to use a "DOS box under windows" given that rxvt is available as an alternative? I'm not trying to be antagonistic, I honestly want to know. Thanks, David (Cygwin FAQ maintainer) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/