Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3BCD3D01.9050509@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 04:10:41 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fergus CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: setup.exe v.2.78.2.13 and setup.ini 1003284004 References: <000b01c156da$c1de11a0$6fc82486 AT medschool DOT dundee DOT ac DOT uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It's an oops in the setup.ini. It'll be fixed soon. --Chuck Fergus wrote: > Ow. I usually trust setup.exe and setup.ini like they were the creations of > gods, but the latest trip to www.cygwin.com to look for updates invites me > just to un-install all 3 of newlib-man, tetex-beta and w32api. Is this > right? The site gave me a new setup.exe v.2.78.2.13 and (I notice) setup.ini > has > > setup-timestamp: 1003284004 > setup-version: 2.78.2.11 > > So for the moment I've just used at this point in the update. > > Fergus > > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/