Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <8F23E55D511AD5119A6800D0B76FDDE101A26B63@cpex3.channelpoint.com>
From: Troy Noble <troy DOT noble AT channelpoint DOT com>
To: "'Bill Smith'" <billsmith AT ynn DOT com>, cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-6.0.11-1
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:44:08 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 1.0 (http://www.roaringpenguin.com/mimedefang/)

Try using _vimrc instead of .vimrc.  I seem to recall reading
somewhere that this would work around the behavior you describe
on Win9x systems.  WinNT/2000 of course does not exhibit that
problem, at least not on NTFS.  I'm not sure about FAT32.

Troy

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Smith [mailto:billsmith AT ynn DOT com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:37 AM
To: cygwin
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-6.0.11-1


This may be a known vi side effect when used in DOS filespace:

Under W98, editing .vimrc using the file name VIMRC~1, vi takes the DOS file
name and saves the file under the same name, not the long name extension.
Thus for example, when .vimrc is saved, it is saved using the long file name
vimrc~1.  The consequence is the name of file .vimrc is changed to vimrc~1.

Bill

----- Original Message -----
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: "cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc: "Scott Brim" <swb AT employees DOT org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 8:28 AM
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: vim-6.0.11-1


> On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:02:27AM -0400, Scott Brim wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 04:54:12PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen allegedly wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:36:19AM -0400, Scott Brim wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 06:46:02AM -0400, Corinna Vinschen allegedly
wrote:
> > > > > I've updated the version of VIM in cygwin/latest to 6.0.11-1.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.  I'm still having problems with initialization time.
vim-5.8-9
> > > > startup time is barely noticeable, but all of the 6.0 versions take
at
> > > > least a second.
> > >
> > > I don't have that problem.  6.0.11 is nearly as fast on startup as
5.8.9.
> >
> > Would you send me your .vimrc?  I'm looking for any clues.
>
> Look for //<letter> paths in $PATH and such stuff.
>
> My .vimrc is attached.
>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Red Hat, Inc.
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/