Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 09:21:33 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: 1.3.3: Incorrect file size for 2GB+ long files Message-ID: <20011016092133.B24209@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <02b101c15643$4fd4d3b0$12dc9c81 AT oulx> <067101c15644$b9c47770$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <067101c15644$b9c47770$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 11:16:10PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >This is a known fault - you've overrun the 32-bit file length attribute, >see the archives for '64 bit'. If you want it fixed, as there are no >_current_ plans to address this in cygwin, you will need to do so >yourself or arrange for someone (ie RedHat :]) to do it as paid >consulting work. > >If you choose to do it yourself, I'm sure there are many willing >commentators happy to point out what needs to be done and provide >pointers if you get stuck. > >I'm also confident that a patch to do this (properly!) would be happily >considered for inclusion - but as Chris Faylor is the project leader >you'll need to see what he says. Hrmh? Wha? What is this patch thing you're talking about? You mean like in blue jeans? That kind of patch? But, seriously, I'd love to have 64 bit support in Cygwin -- as long as it didn't break 32 bit support. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/