Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 19:11:00 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Remove cygwin "History" from FAQ? Message-ID: <20011015191100.B10550@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4956-Mon15Oct2001225801+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <20011015180030 DOT A9792 AT redhat DOT com> <1571-Mon15Oct2001234838+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> <20011015185703 DOT A10506 AT redhat DOT com> <8870-Tue16Oct2001000838+0100-starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8870-Tue16Oct2001000838+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 12:08:37AM +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote: >On Monday 15 Oct 01, Christopher Faylor writes: >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 11:48:37PM +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote: >> >On Monday 15 Oct 01, Christopher Faylor writes: >> >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 10:58:00PM +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote: >> >> >There's a large "Cygwin History" section in the FAQ at >> >> >. It's ancient, with nothing added >> >> >since Dec 1998 (20.1). Although it deserves to be preserved and made >> >> >available somewhere, it's hardly "frequently asked". I wonder if we >> >> >can take it out of the FAQ? >> >> >> >> Yes! I've been meaning to ask you to do this, in fact. >> > >> >OK, but we have to find somewhere else to put it. I recommend it just >> >be tacked on to the end of . This >> >page is also not up to date, and has no direct link to it (that I >> >found), except from the "What is it?" section of the FAQ. >> >> It used to be in the left bar but I figured it was pretty useless so I >> removed it. I did keep the page around, though for hysterical raisins. > >OK, whatever, but can we still put all the other old stuff in there >too? We don't have to resurrect it in the left bar, as far as I'm >concerned. Yes, sure. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/