Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <3BC7164E.37FAA92C@yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 12:11:58 -0400 From: Earnie Boyd Reply-To: MU List X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Tsekov CC: MU List , Kim Saunders , CU List Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] Re: w32api maintainer References: <3BC6FB7F DOT F7A6969D AT yahoo DOT com> <3BC70C37 DOT 98B3733F AT syntrex DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Pavel Tsekov wrote: > > Earnie Boyd wrote: > > > > I.E.: You must supply the constants in whiteroom technique, finding the > > values only from documentation. DO NOT SUBMIT A PATCH WITH CODE COPIED > > FROM THE PSDK. > > > > Do you consider finding it with debugger a whiteroom technique ? :) Or > one > should point exactly from where he extracted the information ? > No! I consider that reverse engineering. The best source for the information is from MSDN. Barring that some well known authorities on Win32 documenting it will be the next best source of information. Earnie. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/