Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <021801c152b2$29276af0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "Peter Buckley" Cc: , References: <01e001c152ac$3e9d8e10$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BC63169 DOT 9CCFCAD8 AT cportcorp DOT com> Subject: Re: Multiple cygwin installs: I have to do it, but how? Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 10:09:28 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Oct 2001 00:15:20.0914 (UTC) FILETIME=[FAD71320:01C152B2] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Buckley" To: "Robert Collins" > > There is no reason for vendors that distribute copies of cygwin1.dll - > > the net release with source - to spend man-weeks fiddling around to make > > everything separate. All they need to do is ship the cygwin1.dll with > > the cygwin setup program and a local cache dir already created. Then for > > their specific apps - say gcc + scripts - all they have to do is > > integrate them the *same way* they would on a unix system. No problem, > > no fuss. > > This seems to be a bad deal for vendors. They get stuck with a lot of > support costs when people call up saying "how come your product doesn't work > anymore?" after they have updated cygwin out from under the vendors's And they paid how much for cygwin? $0.00. Same deal as Linux. I just installed Redhat 7.1 and no longer works. I don't see Redhat pushing for a multiple-kernel-and-libc-of-the-same-major-version-on-a-box capability in Linux. If they were perhaps the the Hurd would be getting more popularity. Also note that the Hurd *still has* a core kernel that cannot be duplicated at runtime. > products. "Oh, just reinstall our software, it will downgrade your cygwin > and you'll be all set." That doesn't seem like it would work well. Some vendors have tried that with Linux based products from time to time. Some still do. Then it becomes a user choice as to whether to buy from that vendor or not. If the vendor wants to put the investment into making a separate install for their users *It is already supported at build time*. Of course it will not run with the bash shell I can download from cygwin, so what, the vendor is doing a special-build just for their product. I understand that. I guess I just don't understand the attraction of having parallel installs of cygwin at run-time. * It's more complex to code. * It _will_ be slower. (think redirection dll with forwarded exports lay er to load the 'instance'). Then multiply that by the number of fork() && exec() calls during a make. * It will be more prone to breakage. "I can't use procmail on my system. - Have you installed cygwin form cygwin.com? - Yes, but I skipped cygwin1.dll cause I already have one from - That's not supported we don't know what they have done to it. - But when I install your one everything is slower - Yes, thats by design!" * Build time parallel installs are already implemented and work! Rob -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/