Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3BC5F84C.B26DB0DA@rowman.com> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:51:40 -0400 From: John Peacock MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: SPAM - Re: (((((((-= Enter To Win One of 25 Dream Vacations!! =-))))))) References: <01090508544004 DOT 01602 AT pessard DOT research DOT canon DOT com DOT au> <20010904221839 DOT A12254 AT redhat DOT com> <005b01c151b5$6641c000$221007d5 AT andreas> <3BC5315B DOT 8090407 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <3BC5A235 DOT 41A57F6C AT rowman DOT com> <20011011153147 DOT G1846 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > > http://www.orbz.org > > http://sources.redhat.com/lists.html#what-software > Your link to ORBZ is to http://orbz.gst-group.co.uk/ which is not the same as what I wrote. I like www.orbz.org for the same reason that I liked www.orbs.org - both treat an open relay by itself as a bad thing. www.orbz.org does require actual SPAM relay to add a host to the inputs list; just a nomination will do it. This is much more agressive than the other lists; for example the servers SMTP[12].stanford.edu are listed in ORBZ.org and no where else because they are running an open relay, but Stanford refuses to do anything about it until they receive proof that the relay is being used to send SPAM. I don't like that attitude... John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/