Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20011011110633.00b81600@san-francisco.beasys.com>
X-Sender: andyp AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:07:27 -0700
To: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
From: Andy Piper <andyp AT bea DOT com>
Subject: Re: More problems with subprocesses in 1.3.3
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <3BC5DBF2.7080705@ece.gatech.edu>
References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20011009125357 DOT 00b61b50 AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com>
 <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20011011094427 DOT 00b7bc60 AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 01:50 PM 10/11/01 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Well, I understand ylogic -- but this "fix" doesn't please me. :-) 
>consider: "Xemacs-21.4.3 is completely broken on my machine, so I reverted 
>to 21.1.13.  I'll try 21.4.x again in a few months -- hope you guys get 
>the problem fixed...."  would not make you happy, would it?

Seems this is more like the difference between 21.4.3 and 21.4.4 than a 
whole major revision.

That doesn't mean I haven't considered reverting to 1.1.7 :)

andy


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/