Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20011011094848.00b6fd20@san-francisco.beasys.com>
X-Sender: andyp AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 09:49:04 -0700
To: David Starks-Browning <starksb AT ebi DOT ac DOT uk>
From: Andy Piper <andyp AT bea DOT com>
Subject: Re: More problems with subprocesses in 1.3.3
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To: <3536-Thu11Oct2001115300+0100-starksb@ebi.ac.uk>
References: <3BC52920 DOT 90905 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
 <4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 2 DOT 20011009125357 DOT 00b61b50 AT san-francisco DOT beasys DOT com>
 <3BC52920 DOT 90905 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 11:53 AM 10/11/01 +0100, David Starks-Browning wrote:
>Andy, since you're likely to compile xemacs with it, you should use an
>'inst' snapshot.  And you should probably not use a snapshot to create
>xemacs binaries for distribution.  (Someone correct me on the 2nd
>point if necessary.)

Where do I get this from?

andy


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/