Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3BC450B3.E4E88EC7@rowman.com> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 09:44:19 -0400 From: John Peacock MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Perl 5.7.2 References: <3BC38B93 DOT 11178 DOT 2FA66410 AT localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Gerrit P. Haase" wrote: > > > Can you figure out when the stackdumps occur the first time? > > I found this in the changes of July: [snip] > ____________________________________________________________________________ > [ 11188] By: jhi on 2001/07/07 15:12:36 > Log: Subject: Re: bleedperl perl_alloc..free leakage > From: Radu Greab > Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 19:48:54 +0300 > Message-ID: <15173 DOT 60406 DOT 308246 DOT 456184 AT ix DOT netsoft DOT ro> > > Leak-be-gone. > Branch: perl > ! op.c [snip] > > But they seem to be very 'old'. > Yes, I could have sworn I was getting clean tests in August, but I could be mistaken. The ithreads stuff is besides the point; I am not building with threads (and it is not the defalt in hints/linux.sh. 11108 looks promising, however. I will pull down that patch and see if I can reverse it out. John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/