Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3BC1D323.861B6670@rowman.com> Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 12:24:03 -0400 From: John Peacock MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Perl 5.7.2 References: <3BC1CF2E DOT 7177 DOT 33050F17 AT localhost> <3BC1B8C0 DOT C1E58D08 AT rowman DOT com> <20011008115635 DOT A18826 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 10:31:28AM -0400, John Peacock wrote: > >There are two issues: > > > >1) CygWin 1.3.3 breaks gdb under Win2K (cannot set breakpoints); > > No, it doesn't. You may have problems using gdb for some reason but I > use gdb on a daily basis on W2K with no problems. > > As always, I can't fix what I can't debug. This, of course, means > that the debugging is left to people who have the problem. > > Said people seem to be incapable of doing more than complaining about > the problem and posting stack traces, however. So, as always, this bug > will go unfixed because everyone who experiences the problem is "too > busy", "too disgusted", "too apathetic", or "too unknowledgeable" to fix > the problem. > > cgf My initial response to this message is "FUCK YOU" but I'm sure this would be perceived as overly hostile, which is of course _your_ problem. I am too busy working on patches to Perl to make it ready to ship 5.8 to debug CygWin. I like CygWin; I use CygWin every day; nonetheless, it is a minor platform in the Perl universe. I have even seen a note from a developer imploring others to NOT port his software to Win32 platform , EVEN UNDER CYGWIN, because the platform is so limited. I am stuck with Win2K/NT as a corporate limitation so I guess I am stuck with CygWin. What I posted was not "It doesn't work for me" but was EVERYTHING I COULD THINK OF that might help someone HELP ME. I searched the archives and found several other people foolish enough to post and the deafening silence from anyone who might know what was going on. My posting has exactly 1 followup, and that was from me. I am so happy that gdb debugging works for you using 1.3.3-2 or are you using a snapshot or CVS copy? You don't say, presumably because you are TOO FUCKING IMPORTANT to talk to the plebes. It does not work for me and only replacing 1.3.3 with 1.3.2 fixes it. Therefore, I think I am on pretty safe ground saying that 1.3.3-2 breaks gdb debugging for Perl. That is a qualified statement, since you don't seem to recognize that I'll repeat it: 1.3.3-2 breaks gdb debugging with Perl Don't tell me you cannot fix it until you can see the error, when you have not shown any interest in recreating my environment, as specified exactly in my earlier post. Needless to say, followups to /dev/null, since I will be unsubscribing from this list immediately after posting. Thanks for listening. John -- John Peacock Director of Information Research and Technology Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 301-459-3366 x.5010 fax 301-429-5747 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/