Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3BBFE62F.9030802@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2001 01:20:47 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fergus on Linux CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Blindly running setup.exe to update Cygwin References: <000501c14e9e$fea96c40$4c7b1f3e AT leper> <3BBF8FA0 DOT 2040207 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <000d01c14ede$7d2ea640$4c7b1f3e AT leper> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit [back on list] Fergus on Linux wrote: >>That should not happen. Do you still have the setup.log file from that >>run of setup.exe, or have you already run setup again since then? Also, >>send you /etc/setup/installed.db file, please. >> > > Thank you very much for your kind interest. > > I enclose as attachments to this email both the files setup.log and > installed.db as they are after a single run of setup.exe as a new user > installing Cygwin for the first time from the network. > > By a "broken" vim I mean [at least] (a) strange lack of information about > mode: "INSERT" not shown at bottom of screen even when in insert mode; (b) > first use of seems equivalent to ; (c) loss of syntax > colours. I have checked that TERM=cygwin: it does. Okay, this is not what I thought you were talking about. I thought "broken" vim meant a popup window that said "Can't find cygncurses5.dll", and vim wasn't runnable at all. *THAT'S* the thread you refered to. Your vim "works" -- it just doesn't work like the the old 5.7 version did. Well, that has nothing to do with libncurses -- I'm sorry I misled you. This is probably due to massive internal changes in vim, as it went from version 5 to version 6 (note that alpha and beta test phases of vim6 took over a year! so there's bound to be lots of changes). I think you're going to have to take this up on the vim mailing list; it is doubtful that these changes are due to anything cygwin specific. > > PS. I suppose the problem could lie with vim v.6 or term* rather than the > installation procedure? I don't think it's the terminfo database. Very little changed therein in the recent update. > (There seem to be several problems with vim reported > recently.) Most of the recent reports were much more serious: "vim won't start" or "missing DLL". Your report is "merely" a fit-and-finish issue. > Or with me! Such a bother: I've observed regular if infrequent > complaints about setup.exe on the mailing list, and always dismissed them as > symptoms of user-brain/-digit dysfunction rather than any inherent fault in > setup.exe. Now I'm in the same situation myself. Thanks again for your > response. Again, I think that setup.exe is not the culprit in your case -- especially as your later private email showed no improvement in these fit-and-finish issues after reinstalling libncurses5. Suggestion: assume that the problem is your .vimrc, and begin debugging from there. I wonder if old .vimrc's are somehow incompatible (older vim's supported keywords that newer vim's do not? Therefore if you use one of those "bad" keywords you have problems, but since I (by luck) avoid them -- whatever they are -- I don't see your problems?) Anyway, this looks like a vim issue, not cygwin nor setup nor ncurses. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/