Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <059f01c14d99$ccc23820$01000001@lifelesswks> From: "Robert Collins" To: "C" , "Peter Buckley" Cc: References: <001701c14cb9$cc6d4b20$821c10ac AT odin> <3BBC9149 DOT 6B1443B0 AT cportcorp DOT com> <053201c14d89$6c909ec0$01000001 AT lifelesswks> <008001c14d98$bd76ece0$861c10ac AT isis> Subject: Re: offering a patch- was [Setup feature query/suggestion!] Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 22:32:25 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Well that could be easily done by assuming it's /var/cache/setup and following and links (to use my prior example) after verifying the users root mount location. Rob ----- Original Message ----- From: "C" To: "Robert Collins" ; "Peter Buckley" Cc: Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 10:24 PM Subject: Re: offering a patch- was [Setup feature query/suggestion!] > Whilst on the subject...if any changes were to be made to setup.exe. > remembering the user specified package directory would be good also between > updates........ > C > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert Collins" > To: "Peter Buckley" ; "C" > Cc: > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 11:35 AM > Subject: Re: offering a patch- was [Setup feature query/suggestion!] > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Peter Buckley" > > > Rest of the list- > > > > > > Is this something that would be appropriate for > > > setup.exe to do, or should it be a separate package? > > > > Thats really up to whoever puts the effort in. > > > > > Should it be a gui, or a command line thing? > > > > Why force a choice? do both. > > > > > I'm sure > > > I could write a bash script or makefile to do this. > > > Are there those on the list who would help me out by > > > providing suggestions on the logic that I should use? > > > > > > I can envision a command like- > > > > > > apt-get clean /cygdrive/c/cygwin > > > > > > And the script would look in /cygdrive/c/cygwin > > > for a "latest" and "contrib" directory, and then > > > go through each package and rm the old ones. But > > > rather than compare modification times or version > > > numbers in the filenames, is there a sure way to > > > make sure we are only removing the packages that are > > > older than what is installed- maybe parsing through > > > cygcheck output? > > > > If I can offer a couple of observations: > > 1) There is currently no persistent storage of the install archive > > directory. A patch to cygwin to make /var/cache/setup (for example) a > > symlink to the location the package cache is in would achieve this in a > > simple fashion. > > 2) The logic to parse /etc/setup.db is already present in setup.exe. So > > it would be easier IMO to build a couple of options - say > > "remove all files not listed in the current setup.ini" and > > "remove all files that have a more recent version installed" - via > > setup.exe than > > to reinvent that logic (and keep it updated as setup.exe changes). > > > > Rob > > > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/