Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3BBD2F1E.3060204@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 23:55:10 -0400 From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: REALLY need help prior to 1.3.4 release References: <20011003000916 DOT A28775 AT redhat DOT com> <3BBAA8EC DOT 3000706 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011003110421 DOT E28936 AT redhat DOT com> <20011003112140 DOT J28936 AT redhat DOT com> <20011003225215 DOT A23380 AT redhat DOT com> <3BBC63AB DOT 1070203 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011004224133 DOT A19253 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 09:27:07AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>I updated to "current" CVS last night around 1am EDT, and rebuilt >>cygwin. After installing that, I saw the same behavior as before: raw >>read worked, raw write did not (Permission denied). :-( >> > > This was really strange. Everything worked fine for me until I ejected > my floppy. From that point on, I couldn't write to any floppy. I had to > scroll back several times to convince myself that I wasn't > hallucinating. > > Anyway, since I could eventually duplicate the problem, I could actually > fix it. > > So, how about *now*, Chuck? Does it work *now*? > > (If it doesn't just lie...) I'll give it a shot, in the morning. Right now I'm trying to get autoconf to pass its tests again. Here's the deal: Per the earlier discussion about autoconf-2.13/2.52, I was attempting to do a side-by-side installation of the two, and decided to run the checks. (eventaully to write a script that parses configure.in for the AC_REQ[] line to determine which one to call, etc). 2.13 had "226 expected passes, 33 unexpected failures". (On both cygwin-20011001, and cygwin-1.3.3-2). This is the same as our previous experiments, if you remember those. 2.52 was failing all over the place with cygwin-20011001. (With 1.3.2, we had finally gotten autoconf to pass all tests). I'm currently running the tests again with 1.3.3-2, to make sure the 'breakage' occurred during the 1.3.4 development cycle and not before. So far I'm passing all tests with 1.3.3-2 (but this'll take several more hours to complete on my machine). All tests performed on W2Ksp2, CYGWIN=ntsec, and /usr/local/bin/mktemp is the implementation from courtesan.com (we had previously determined that "my" implementation in the misc package sucked; the courtesan version was good). Sigh. I'm not sure I have the energy for this. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/