Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3BAFC4A8.1090303@likai.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 19:41:28 -0400
From: Li-Kai Liu <news AT likai DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010913
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ls & "magic" cygdrive dir (was: RE: cygdrive stuff)
References: <NFBBLOMHALONCDMPGBLFOEFICCAA DOT info AT rlsystems DOT net> <3BAFBF02 DOT 4050809 AT likai DOT net> <100a01c1454f$bbcdbc80$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Robert Collins wrote:

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Li-Kai Liu" <news AT likai DOT net>
>
>>however, files and file systems are two different concepts! fhandler
>>
>
>Corinna has already indicated that this is the desired end direction,
>with one class hierarchy for fs's and one for files.
>
>>apparently it is not the way it is right now in cygwin. :(
>>
>
>Exactly. However making the readdir and opendir calls use objects and
>stop being hardcoded to win32 is a good step in the right direction.
>
>>to code the way i want them to. i'll genuinely code this thing if I
>>
>know
>
>>that people like my idea and so it won't end up being hated and
>>
>discarded.
>
>It won't end up being hated and discarded :]. I strongly suggest a
>one-step-at-a-time approach though: a series of small patches that make
>specific changes to get from here to there. Biting off too much is a
>common reason for architectural changes to fail.
>
>Rob
>
however i am eager, i must agree with you on "one-step-at-a-time" 
approach. i know i have a tendency to get greedy and slurp a big chunk 
at once, but at the same time i also fear that any addition to (or more 
reliance on) the current unorthodox way fhandler works would also make 
the transition more difficult.

liulk



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/