Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <0132D06F0EF0D311A3E6009027BA1EA90F123883@brnyc-exch02.brnycdom.blkint.com>
From: "Deno, Emerson" <Emerson DOT Deno AT blackrock DOT com>
To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: safe to compile gcc-2.95.2 for cygwin with -O3?
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 10:35:03 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

hi i am working on a cross compiler from solaris to cygwin. everything
worked great and
i got my entire project to compile over (including X stuff with xfree86). to
speed the speed of the compiler
and my  programs, i used CFLAGS='-O3' LIBCFLAGS='-g -O3' LIBCXXFLAGS='-g -O3
-fno-implicit-flags' with the 
make command. nearly all my programs work fine but some give a strange
errors when assigning a string to another string.
i could give more details but i'd rather just now if the -O3 flag is tested
with the gcc 2.95.2 libc and libcstdc++. if it isn't i'd just recompile
with -O2 or -O.
		thanks a lot and keep up the great work,
			emerson deno

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/