Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 16:57:54 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: German Win98, US Win95 keyboard --> no ;'` keys in Bash Message-ID: <20010920165754.A16742@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010920161327 DOT 031a29b0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 01:39:13PM -0700, Jason Tiller wrote: >On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: >> At 04:08 PM 9/20/2001, Jason Tiller wrote: >> >On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: >> > > At 01:29 PM 9/20/2001, Hans-Bernhard Broeker wrote: >> > >> > > >None of these keys yields any reaction at the Bash prompt: >> > > >' ; ' (i.e. quote, backquote and semicolon) >> > > >... >> > > >Any ideas what to look up next, or how to fix this? >> > >> > > You can check the email archives on this. I believe it was Jason >> > > Tishler (sorry Jason if I'm remembering this wrong) that did some >> > > work relative to the interpretation of keys in different >> > > environments. >> > >> >Ah, quite a distinction to be mistaken for the honorable Tischler! :) > >> Thanks Jason (Tiller) for setting my poor memory (and improper >> spelling) straight! :-) > >::sigh:: I should know better than to try to get fancy. ;) You were >right the first time! I attribute it to replying to a German and thus >getting into the "sch" mode. > >Thanks for the kind words, and I hope we have a final resolution from >Chris/Corinna soon. > >Translation: Should there be a [no]right_alt_meta CYGWIN= option? > >If so, I would be glad to submit a patch with that functionality (I >think I have it lying around here somewhere...). > >If not, should the keyboard language vs. META translation code be >removed (i.e. revert to 1.1.8 keystroke interpreter)? I could patch >that as well. Jason, I thought that you had things working to your satisfaction with the current code in Cygwin. If the current situation does work for some people I don't see any reason to rip it out. I would like to figure out why it doesn't work for other people though. How many failing bug reports have we had? I haven't really been paying attention. Has anyone tried to figure out why things aren't working right? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/