Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 12:07:22 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: WTF?! Message-ID: <20010920120722.A32652@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010918114701 DOT D510 AT redhat DOT com> <20010920013727 DOT A5780 AT mamet DOT westofhouse DOT net> <20010920112518 DOT A28377 AT redhat DOT com> <3BAA0DE9 DOT 7EC296EE AT syntrex DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3BAA0DE9.7EC296EE@syntrex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 05:40:25PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: >Cristopher, why dont just you stop reading those posts which actually >dont tend to be good enough for you ? Because I am mean. >I think if point 1 applies to you then you are not being paid to read >the mailing lists too - are you ? No. I'm not. Would you like me to ignore all of the email I get relating to keeping this mailing list running, too? I could just turn the mailing list off. That would be a lot easier. >So "silly" mails are easily to be recognized - you can just pass them >by. If the "silly" emails are so easily recognized then why were you contributing to the discussion? Why were you discussing making modifications to libiberty which had already been done in CVS? Why were you discussing solutions at all when I already suggested that people either use the CVS version or remove the offending file from the makefile? Maybe your "ignore filter" is a little too high and mine is a little too low. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/