Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:40:02 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin Subject: Re: Latest Install - Domain account - File permisssions Message-ID: <20010917184002.E10081@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: <20010917181241 DOT B10081 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <3BA62542 DOT 4060807 AT likai DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3BA62542.4060807@likai.net>; from news@likai.net on Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:30:58PM -0400 On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:30:58PM -0400, Li-Kai Liu wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 07:00:38AM -0700, Serge Pluess wrote: > > > >>Hi there > >> > >>yep, The machine is part of that domain, I am logging in as a member of the domain and this is the only domain we have. > >> > >>Both commands end up with the same results: > >> > >>mkpasswd -d > >>mkpasswd -d mydomain > >> > >>One thing I have noticed is that there are 12 entries for the local accounts for the machine. It seems that the mkpasswd -d is starting getting the right users, but stops after reaching the count of the local entries. > >> > > > >Sounds pretty unlikely since getting local vs. global accounts are > >different functions in mkpasswd. I have performed three checks with > >domains with 13, 141 and 632 users and mkpasswd worked as expected. > > > >You will have to debug that problem since you seem to be the only > >person with that problem so far. > > > >Corinna > > > i also noticed that (with local accounts), mkpasswd outputs the users > with wrong group id. all user's group is set to 513, which when shown > from mkpasswd -g (or mkgroup), is a None group. fortunately i just had > to manually edit all 4 users and that's all i need to do. isn't this > observation interesting? Not really. It's the expected behaviour since domainless machines don't support the concept of settable primary groups as it's on U*X and in NT domains. Therefore all users have the fixed primary group of 513 = None on domainless machines. Unless you're using ntsec in Cygwin of course ;-) Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/