Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010911020929.00ac0fc0@imap.local.mscha.com> X-Sender: ml AT imap DOT local DOT mscha DOT com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 02:10:00 +0200 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Michael Schaap Subject: Re: Virus Found In-Reply-To: <59jqpt4f25eochmtlslvv9nodngnkeeo3d@4ax.com> References: <20010911004146 DOT H937 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <8F23E55D511AD5119A6800D0B76FDDE101A26A59 AT cpex3 DOT channelpoint DOT com> <20010911004146 DOT H937 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: at mscha.org by amavisd-milter snapshot-20010714 (http://amavis.org/) At 01:36 11-9-2001, Mark Gordon wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 04:27:40PM -0600, Troy Noble wrote: > >> Hah! That's good. > >> > >> And I also saw Chuck's note about scp working... so maybe it's a > non-issue. > > > >But that's not quite true. This was a long discussed topic on > >the openssh-usinx-dev mailing list about the unluck interference > >of profile output and scp... Hrm, it's some months ago, I > >wonder if it's solved somehow and I didn't pay attention... > >I was recently (within the past few weeks) having problems with scp >due to this, so it is still a potential problem with some systems. > >If people are seriously interested I can investigate this further. It >may be that one of the systems involved has an old version of ssh >causing the problem. I don't think this should be a problem - /etc/profile is only called for login shells. I just tested my RedHat box (running openssh 2.5.2p2), and this works as it should: $ ssh machine runs /etc/profile, but $ ssh machine ls and $ scp machine:file . do not. - Michael -- I always wondered about the meaning of life. So I looked it up in the dictionary under "L" and there it was - the meaning of life. It was not what I expected. - Dogbert -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/