Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:32:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Omid Roshan-Afshar To: Corinna Vinschen Subject: Re: recv() blocking for non-blocking socket In-Reply-To: <20010910184646.T937@cygbert.vinschen.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Alright, thanks alot. Is there a temporary work-around? On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 11:38:40AM -0400, Omid Roshan-Afshar wrote: > > I've looked through the archive, and I found > > some discussion about using accept() on non-blocking > > sockets, but none on recv(). If someone could spot > > any stupid errors in the following code, that would > > be great. > > > > { > > int true = 1; > > if (ioctl(sock_handle, FIONBIO, &true) != 0) { > > if (errmsg!=NULL) > > sprintf(errmsg, "ioctl(): %s", strerror(errno)); > > return GFAPI_ERR_FAIL; > > } > > } > > > > I call recv after I do this and it blocks. I *think* I'm > > doing the appropriate thing to make the socket non-blocking. > > Actually that's a bug in Cygwin 1.3.2. It should be solved > with the upcoming 1.3.3 version. > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat, Inc. > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/