Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <3B9A3DA9.8030902@ece.gatech.edu>
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 11:47:53 -0400
From: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010713
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hack =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kampbj=F8rn?= <hack AT hackdata DOT com>
CC: "C. Porter Bassett" <cporter AT byu DOT edu>, cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: wget not behaving correctly
References: <999820851 DOT 27921 DOT ezmlm AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> <3B99E9DD DOT D7476A28 AT hackdata DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hack Kampbjørn wrote:


> Second, wget will save the first retrieved page as
> 'galleries.php?mode=2' which is an illegal filename on Windows file
> systems (because of the '?') again I cannot tell if this is the case.
> There are a couple of patches to workaround this in the wget archives
> (http://sunsite.dk/wget/) but none has been accept by the Wget
> mantainers (too Windows specific), nor has the Cygwin mantainer used it
> in the cygwin version.


I didn't know they existed.  I'll take a look when I get ready to 
release the next cygwin-wget.

> Chuck, is there any extra functionality in cygwin-1.3.3 or is this just
> a resource problem (limited time) ?


Yeah, it's "just" a time thing; I got pretty bogged down in working on 
the latest cygwin (well, actually just *testing* cgf & corinna & etc's 
work.  I did no "real" work.)

> In the second case should I take over mantainership for cygwin wget (a
> version 1.7.1 is expected any time now) ?


I'd love to turn it over to somebody, if there are no objections.  One 
worry, though: you aren't very active on the mailing list.  I count only 
  four messages from you over the last six months (but ALL were about 
wget, so that's good) -- plus one message in May 2000 about CVS.  You do 
seem to be more informed that I about wget, where it's going, current 
development, etc. -- but will you answer list questions about it and 
stuff?  There's more to maintaining a cygwin package than just putting 
out timely releases (that's good, because otherwise with my track 
record, I'd be out of a job! <g>)

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/