Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: fred AT ontosys DOT com Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:53:14 -0500 To: "Larry Hall \(RFK Partners, Inc\)" Cc: "Berndl, Klaus" , "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" Subject: Re: Openssh question Message-ID: <20010906125314.A7871@ontosys.com> References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010906131556 DOT 023334d8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20010906131556.023334d8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>; from lhall@rfk.com on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:20:25PM -0400 On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 01:20:25PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: > To me, it seems somewhat obvious that /usr/doc would have useful > documentation but perhaps we need a (more?) pointer(s) to it to > enforce this notion for everyone? Even though the above is obvious to some, it is _not_ obvious that some packages have their own folders under /usr/doc and others have READMEs in the /usr/doc/Cygwin folder. Perhaps the FAQ could emphasize looking in /usr/doc/Cygwin, not just /usr/doc. The current FAQ doesn't refer to "/usr/doc" at all. -- Fred Yankowski fred AT OntoSys DOT com tel: +1.630.879.1312 Principal Consultant www.OntoSys.com fax: +1.630.879.1370 OntoSys, Inc 38W242 Deerpath Rd, Batavia, IL 60510, USA -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/