Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 12:09:57 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: time:ing non-cygwin apps Message-ID: <20010905120957.A22905@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <8F23E55D511AD5119A6800D0B76FDDE101A26A3F AT cpex3 DOT channelpoint DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8F23E55D511AD5119A6800D0B76FDDE101A26A3F@cpex3.channelpoint.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:06:45AM -0600, Troy Noble wrote: >>Did you actually READ the code? It is easy enough to download and >>inspectable with any simple text editor. It is not brain surgey or >>rocket science! It's just C++ code! > >>Is this what you were expecting? :-)) > >>But, seriously, FWIW, everything you said was 100% correct. You're >>impressed by the way cygwin handles exec and I'm impressed that you >>figured it out. Thank you for the cogent explanation. > >Ugh. Boy you scared me there for a second. Sorry. I couldn't resist. >I think I might join the developers list (finally) and then I won't >have to bother the world with my proposed fixes. > >Definitely need to fill out an assignment form as you suggest... >unless I miss my guess, it could get into a bit more than a few lines >of code. I'm not trying to discourage you from the developers list but you can always send patches to cygwin-patches, too. You can subscribe to that group without approval. I will approve your subscription to cygwin-developers, if you decide that's the way to go, though. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/