Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From: "Ronald Landheer" <info AT rlsystems DOT net>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Slight problem with setup.exe utility
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 15:06:49 +0200
Message-ID: <NFBBLOMHALONCDMPGBLFOEDCCAAA.info@rlsystems.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <999607523.7413.5.camel@lifelesswks>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal

Hello Robert /et al./

I downloaded the new setup.exe and ran it. It downloaded the new 
setup.ini, thought it found the right version of cygwin in my tarball 
directory, didn't download, but couldn't install either.
The thing is: it found the cygwin tarball among my downloaded tarballs 
when downloading the newer tarballs, but didn't find it when installing.

Greetz!

Ronald

-----Original Message-----
From: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
[mailto:cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com]On Behalf Of Robert Collins
Sent: September 4, 2001 14:45
To: Ronald Landheer
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Slight problem with setup.exe utility


On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 22:25, Ronald Landheer wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I've installed Cygwin quite a while ago, but as I had a severe computer 
> crash yesterday, I had to re-install both Windows and cygwin from 
> scratch. I had some old downloads lying around, in which the cygwin 
> tarball was called cygwin-1.3.2-1.tar.gz while it is now called cygwin-
> 1.3.2-1.tar.bz2. I don't know what the reason of the filename change is 
> - as there is no version change here, but it confuses the setup utility: 
> it does not say that my cygwin is old, but it refuses to unpack because 
> the .bz2 file doesn't exist.

Huh? Did you use the old setup.exe with the old .ini and old tarballs,
or did you use a newer tarball and and old .ini with the old setup.exe?
Setup will warn if incompatible options have been introduced, and
tar.bz2 handling is built into the current setup.exe available on the
website.

Sounds like you would have been better off downloading the current
setup.exe and running it from your old download directory. That would
likely have behaved better.

Rob 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/