Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:23:31 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Suggestion for Cygwin User's guide Message-ID: <20010903182331.F3225@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <00c101c134c0$53962ac0$76c606d5 AT andreas> <20010903173431 DOT A3140 AT redhat DOT com> <012901c134c5$8da83fa0$76c606d5 AT andreas> <20010903182218 DOT E3225 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010903182218.E3225@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 06:22:18PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 12:12:42AM +0200, Andreas Eibach wrote: >> >>> I don't think that the section should be duplicated but I do think that >>> the setup part should have a link to the detailed CYGWIN description. >>> >>> I'd appreciate it if you could provide a patch to do this, in fact. >> >>No problem. :-) >>OK, I attached a draft where you can see what I had in mind. >>(_moved_, not _copied_, as you said, "you don't want it duplicate". It is >>not duplicate now. :-)). >> >>Andreas >> >>P.S. Actually it would be better to have the SGML (or sorta) source handy >>here, because editing the HTML reveals that it's generated by some >>conversion tool (sgml to html or similar). Besides, I don't think the >>maintainers like too see me hack around here like this, but what the >>heck...:) > >Um, yeah. Any patches you send will have to be against the html source. ^^^^ sgml cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/