Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <200108310548.LAA30501@sentry-lan.unibase.com> To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" From: Milton Calnek Subject: RPM. Was: Re: press for cygwin X-Mailer: NMH-1.0 In-reply-to: "Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:30:22 -0400." "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:48:50 +0600 So all of this makes me want to ask the question: When will the cygwin install support a more rpm'ish style install so that we can know less and still pick & choose packages. I kind of thought that given the close ties to RedHat, that it would have it by now... Inspite of the missing rpm features in the setup, I think cygwin is great. My thanks to all the developers involved. In message <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010831110054 DOT 021ae218 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>, "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" writes: > > The issue of performing a full Cygwin installation is one that this list > understands well and is something that's being addressed. The strong > recommendation to install *all* packages comes from the fact that there > are implicit interdependencies among packages. Folks who try to > pick-and-choose the packages they want without an understanding of the > > > Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com > RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com > 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office > Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX > -- Milton Calnek milton AT calnek DOT com TTI: +1 920 617 7187 milton AT tti-telecom DOT com www.tti-telecom.com GCS d- s:+ a- C++$ ULH+++$ P+++ L+++ E--- W-- N o? K w O? M+ V- PS++ PE Y+ PGP->+ t+ !5 X+ R tv b+ DI++ !D G>++++ e++ h--- r+++ y+++ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/