Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:49:29 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Press for Cygwin Message-ID: <20010830164929.A16631@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010830155843 DOT 022e12c0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010830155843 DOT 022e12c0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <5 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 14 DOT 2 DOT 20010830223755 DOT 05384ec0 AT imap DOT local DOT mscha DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010830223755.05384ec0@imap.local.mscha.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 10:42:30PM +0200, Michael Schaap wrote: >At 22:06 30-8-2001, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 03:58:48PM -0400, Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) >>wrote: >>>Hi all, >>> >>>For those of you interested, there is a good article that promotes >>>Cygwin, at least in the context of its support of the OpenSSH port. >>>Check it out: >>> >>> http://www.win2000mag.com/articles/index.cfm?articleid=21992 >> >>Nice article except ARGH! they mention using WinZip to unpack the archives. > >You sure? >I think you might feel differently when the support requests come in to >this mailing list from people who created an extremely non-standard hacked >Cygwin installation... ;-( Which, coincidentially, was kinda my point. Or does ARGH! mean something different where you come from? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/