Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20010830093245.02235f08@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:34:52 -0400 To: Jesper Eskilson , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: Up-to-date info on '-mno-cygwin' vs. Mingw32 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 07:24 AM 8/30/2001, Jesper Eskilson wrote: >Hi! > >I'm trying to get my hands on some up-to-date info on what the >difference (if any) is between building binaries using Cygwin's gcc >with the -mno-cygwin flag and using the Mingw32 suite. Mumit Khans >-mno-cygwin howto seems a little bit out-of-date. > >/Jesper >-- The difference is in the build environment, not the result. If you like using Cygwin based tools (make, grep, sed, etc), use Cygwin's gcc and -mno-cygwin to target Win32 without cygwin1.dll. Otherwise, use the Mingw toolset. Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/