Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3B8D2E41.7020007@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:02:41 -0400 From: "Charles S. Wilson" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael F. March" CC: John Marshall , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug References: <017d01c130ad$7985eca0$0d76aec7 AT D4LHBR01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Please, not again. do NOT start this thread AGAIN. Go back, read the archives where this was discussed thoroughly. Synopsis: not now, *maybe* later; many things must happen first. --Chuck Michael F. March wrote: > Is there a reason why all the packages for Cygwin are not > managed via RPM instead of these compressed tar balls? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/