Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:37:01 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: On Cygwin package naming and a setup.exe bug
Message-ID: <20010829103701.A3960@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E32E AT IIS000>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E32E@IIS000>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 03:33:21PM +0200, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote:
>>You might want to subscribe to cygwin-developers to know what is
>>scheduled, or look in the archives.  cygwin AT cygwin DOT com is the general
>>discussion forum, and cygwin-apps is for ported applications.
>>Setup.exe is neither.
>
>I don't subscribe to cygwin-developpers as I'm *not* a developper (I
>regret it but *really* don't have time to), don't want my mailbox to be
>more filled than it already is (not counting the fact that it's not an
>open list IIRC), but setup.exe seems to be discussed so often on the
>general list that...

Hmm, and cygwin1.dll is discussed here, too, so...

And, we discuss releases here quite a lot...

I've seen mount mentioned on a regular basis...

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/