Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Re: problem building program:  undef ref _imp__gettext
From: Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc: Mark Paulus <commpg AT yahoo DOT com>, cygwin mailing list <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <3B8B264C.5030800@ece.gatech.edu>
References: <ITDOMAIN002DYjqQMol00000064 AT itdomain002 DOT itdomain DOT net DOT au>
	<998970409 DOT 26907 DOT 3 DOT camel AT robertlinux>  <3B8B264C DOT 5030800 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <998981249.27029.6.camel@robertlinux>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12 (Preview Release)
Date: 28 Aug 2001 17:01:26 +1000
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Aug 2001 07:02:23.0700 (UTC) FILETIME=[635DB940:01C12F8F]

On 28 Aug 2001 01:04:12 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> 
> > On 27 Aug 2001 14:51:05 -0600, Mark Paulus wrote:
> > 
> >>Ok, I am guilty as charged of the "minimilistic" information.  
> >>I am trying to build the debian dpkg source package, in an
> >>effort to start a debian-cygwin project.  dpkg does use
> >>autoconf, and as such, I ran it in it's default state.  I will
> >>try re-running it with the pointers you gave me, and then 
> >>see about what it takes to get it to build OOB.
> >>
> > 
> > dpkg requires fifo's last I looked at it. 
> > 
> > You need to create proper fifos for cygwin _before_ worrying about the
> > package per se.
> > 
> > I'm happy to send a patch for cygwin that has partially functioning
> > fifos, but it's quite bitrotted now, and had problems with fork when I
> > last looked at it.
> 
> 
> don't you need a daemon to handle permissions for fifos to work? Or am I 
> confusing that with something else?

The daemon is _needed_ for improving some security aspects.
It's also _needed_ for shm to work properly.
Coincidentally it makes things like fifos a lot easier, because you can
potentially just pass around a pair of pipe() handles, rather than the
mucking around with mapped memory regions I'm doing at the moment.

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/