Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: "Gerrit P. Haase" Organization: Esse keine toten Tiere To: "Max Bowsher" , Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 22:16:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: I suggest creation of a list of package maintainers Reply-to: gp AT familiehaase DOT de Message-ID: <3B8823BE.28239.D8051C4@localhost> In-reply-to: <007301c12d9a$5b4449a0$2a00000a@max> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12cDE) X-Hops: 1 X-Sender: 320081107336-0001 AT t-dialin DOT net Max Bowsher schrieb am 2001-08-25, 20:15: >Dear List, > I notice that some cygwin packages are not current with the main >versions. I believe (as there is no CYGWIN-PATCHES directory in most of the >source tarballs) that the build is mostly OOTB. No doubt there are many on >the cygwin list like me, whose skills are not up to complex porting jobs, >but could help out with mundane maintenance. To help this, I suggest a list >of maintained and unmaintained packages. I suggest that all package >maintainers send a note (need not be any more than the name of the >package(s) you maintain) to me at max AT bowshernet DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk and once I >have recieved several replies, I will publish a collated list on the web. > >!!! Comments? Do you think this would be a useful resource? What about the cygwin-apps list? >As I see it, the main use of such a list would be to prevent people from >stepping on each others toes regarding maintaining packages. > >Regards, >Max. Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/