Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:50:49 +0200 (MEST)
From: "S. L." <s_i_lao AT gmx DOT net>
To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3B817D25 DOT 4020507 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Subject: Re: Samba for Cygwin
X-Authenticated-Sender: #0006551723 AT gmx DOT net
X-Authenticated-IP: [194.102.244.61]
Message-ID: <21941.998380249@www15.gmx.net>
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Flags: 0001
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Actually, all posts here were taking as a dogma things like "Windows does
implicitly support the SMB protocol". This is quite not so real, as far as a
windows machine having just the network card and TCP/IP installed, without
"Client for Microsoft Networks" & "File and printer sharing for Micorsoft
Networks" (on w9x) or "Server" & "Client" services (on NT/2k), is just like an un*x
machine having eth0 seen by the kernel and configured for TCP/IP properly.

Take it just as an info, not argue :))

SLao

-- 
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/