Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com From: "Ronald Landheer" To: Subject: RE: Automake 1.4l released -- show of hands from cygwin/automake maintainers? Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:08:02 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: <20010815221348.A18360@redhat.com> -- waving my hand -- I am moving most of my software around between Linux, CygWin and DJGPP, and use Automake for all of them. At the moment, I'm using mostly CygWin, so yes, I use Automake under CygWin to maintain my software (and yes, I've had some problems with make distcheck recently, and decided not to support it for the moment, because I wasn't sure whether the bug was mine or not, and didn't want to spend too much time finding out).. I guess when I need a valid distcheck, I'll just move the source to another platform and bootstrap there.. (for the time being - I'd love a fix of any known bug, because I don't like bugs) Greetz! Ronald > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com > [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com]On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:14 AM > To: cygwin AT Cygwin DOT Com > Subject: Re: Automake 1.4l released -- show of hands from > cygwin/automake maintainers? > > > [This is for the cygwin mailing list] > On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 08:28:05PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>>> "Charles" == Charles Wilson writes: > > > >Charles> Nope. It actually seems to be due to a change in automake. > >Charles> Apparently, make distcheck did not previously 'chmod -R a-w'. > > > >I looked a bit but due to massive reorganization it is a pain to find > >out when this went in. > > > > > >We rely on `cp -p' in a few places, all in `dist'. The problem is > >most obvious in `distcheck' because it makes the tree read-only when > >it is unpacked. But suppose you use something like CVSREAD and check > >out a tree. Then a file like configure could very well be read-only, > >leading to the same problem for a simple `dist'. > > > >I think we could add a check for whether "cp -p works in ." to > >AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE and then use the result everywhere. For this to work > >we'd also need to add code to `missing' to handle this case, I think > >(code I'm not entirely sure how to write -- ideally it would restore > >the original file's permissions once it was done with the copy). > > > >I think our goal should be to support this feature everywhere. But if > >there aren't maintainers who need this in 1.5, I would prefer to file > >a PR and leave it until a later release. If you are such a > >maintainer, please speak up. Charles, are you? > > Can we get a show of hands for people who are actually trying to use > automake as a *maintainer* under cygwin. > > I suspect that this is not a big deal and that there is no reason to > force automake people to waste time on Cygwin's irregularities for > this release. > > If a bunch of people step forward, however, then, obviously I'm wrong. > > Again. > > So, is anyone using automake in this capacity? If you don't know what > I'm talking about then you undoubtedly are not using automake as > a maintainer. > > cgf > > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/