Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Reply-To: From: "Norman Vine" To: Subject: RE: Automake 1.4l released -- show of hands from cygwin/automake maintainers? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 22:58:22 -0400 Message-ID: <001301c125ff$50a28180$a300a8c0@nhv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 In-Reply-To: <20010815221348.A18360@redhat.com> Importance: Normal Christopher Faylor writes: > >Can we get a show of hands for people who are actually trying to use >automake as a *maintainer* under cygwin. > >I suspect that this is not a big deal and that there is no reason to >force automake people to waste time on Cygwin's irregularities for >this release. > >If a bunch of people step forward, however, then, obviously I'm wrong. I am. But I can live without 'make distcheck' I can 'make dist' and then manually test it There is also the SourceForge Linux shell account to use, and since any project built using Cygwin and needing 'make dist' has to be OpenSourced, all such Cygwin Projects also have this resource :-) So even though I am a project 'maintainer' I see no reason to 'force' the good automake people to waste time on this. Cheers Norman Vine -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/