Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3B7B3109.8080708@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 22:33:45 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010713 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT Cygwin DOT Com Subject: Re: Automake 1.4l released -- show of hands from cygwin/automake maintainers? References: <3B7974C6 DOT 83934084 AT yahoo DOT com> <3B797B22 DOT C06C71D9 AT yahoo DOT com> <87bslip7hj DOT fsf AT creche DOT redhat DOT com> <20010814195923 DOT A28367 AT redhat DOT com> <87wv46uoac DOT fsf AT creche DOT redhat DOT com> <997839007 DOT 16944 DOT 3 DOT camel AT robertlinux> <3B79DED8 DOT 3040807 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <87snes4u2y DOT fsf AT creche DOT redhat DOT com> <20010815221348 DOT A18360 AT redhat DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Christopher Faylor wrote: > [This is for the cygwin mailing list] > On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 08:28:05PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>>>>"Charles" == Charles Wilson writes: >>>>>>> >>Charles> Nope. It actually seems to be due to a change in automake. >>Charles> Apparently, make distcheck did not previously 'chmod -R a-w'. >> >>I looked a bit but due to massive reorganization it is a pain to find >>out when this went in. >> >> >>We rely on `cp -p' in a few places, all in `dist'. The problem is >>most obvious in `distcheck' because it makes the tree read-only when >>it is unpacked. But suppose you use something like CVSREAD and check >>out a tree. Then a file like configure could very well be read-only, >>leading to the same problem for a simple `dist'. >> >>I think we could add a check for whether "cp -p works in ." to >>AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE and then use the result everywhere. For this to work >>we'd also need to add code to `missing' to handle this case, I think >>(code I'm not entirely sure how to write -- ideally it would restore >>the original file's permissions once it was done with the copy). >> >>I think our goal should be to support this feature everywhere. But if >>there aren't maintainers who need this in 1.5, I would prefer to file >>a PR and leave it until a later release. If you are such a >>maintainer, please speak up. Charles, are you? >> > > Can we get a show of hands for people who are actually trying to use > automake as a *maintainer* under cygwin. > > I suspect that this is not a big deal and that there is no reason to > force automake people to waste time on Cygwin's irregularities for > this release. I believe that this problem is NOT a showstopper for either cygwin-1.3.3 or automake-1.5. However, it's good that you're doing the poll Chris, just to be sure. > So, is anyone using automake in this capacity? If you don't know what > I'm talking about then you undoubtedly are not using automake as > a maintainer. For the record, I am not. (No need for everybody on the list to write "me neither" messages; let's keep this to only positive replies. I replied to the thread mainly for my OTHER paragraph, not this one.) --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/