Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 21:30:03 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: binutils is no longer experimental Message-ID: <20010808213003.A10813@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010807163431 DOT A31008 AT redhat DOT com> <011f01c11fd7$a18a9c50$cd823bd5 AT dmitry> <20010808111705 DOT E4406 AT redhat DOT com> <006901c12070$e8e8ee50$d2823bd5 AT dmitry> <20010808204440 DOT A10671 AT redhat DOT com> <00ce01c12078$deb4f4d0$d2823bd5 AT dmitry> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <00ce01c12078$deb4f4d0$d2823bd5@dmitry>; from dmitry@baikal.ru on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 10:12:09AM +0800 On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 10:12:09AM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: >"Christopher Faylor" wrote: > >> >Thanks for your answer. Could you please answer one more: why binutils >> >provided by Cygwin distribution is so different from the ordinal one? >> >Is it planned to do a merge? >> >> ??? It is not "so different". There is one minor change (below) in ld. >> >> Otherwise it is straight from binutils CVS. > >Well, this command line > >diff -ur binutils-20010802-1\binutils binutils-2.11.2\binutils >binutils.diff > >gives a 328292 bytes diff. It is without comparison of other subdirectories. > >Am I doing something wrong? "CVS" cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/