Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <00ce01c12078$deb4f4d0$d2823bd5@dmitry> From: "Dmitry Timoshkov" To: References: <20010807163431 DOT A31008 AT redhat DOT com> <011f01c11fd7$a18a9c50$cd823bd5 AT dmitry> <20010808111705 DOT E4406 AT redhat DOT com> <006901c12070$e8e8ee50$d2823bd5 AT dmitry> <20010808204440 DOT A10671 AT redhat DOT com> Subject: Re: binutils is no longer experimental Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:12:09 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 "Christopher Faylor" wrote: > >Thanks for your answer. Could you please answer one more: why binutils > >provided by Cygwin distribution is so different from the ordinal one? > >Is it planned to do a merge? > > ??? It is not "so different". There is one minor change (below) in ld. > > Otherwise it is straight from binutils CVS. Well, this command line diff -ur binutils-20010802-1\binutils binutils-2.11.2\binutils >binutils.diff gives a 328292 bytes diff. It is without comparison of other subdirectories. Am I doing something wrong? -- Dmitry. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/