Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID: <00ce01c12078$deb4f4d0$d2823bd5@dmitry>
From: "Dmitry Timoshkov" <dmitry AT baikal DOT ru>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <20010807163431 DOT A31008 AT redhat DOT com> <011f01c11fd7$a18a9c50$cd823bd5 AT dmitry> <20010808111705 DOT E4406 AT redhat DOT com> <006901c12070$e8e8ee50$d2823bd5 AT dmitry> <20010808204440 DOT A10671 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject: Re: binutils is no longer experimental
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:12:09 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200

"Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:

> >Thanks for your answer. Could you please answer one more: why binutils
> >provided by Cygwin distribution is so different from the ordinal one?
> >Is it planned to do a merge?
> 
> ???  It is not "so different".  There is one minor change (below) in ld.
> 
> Otherwise it is straight from binutils CVS.

Well, this command line

diff -ur binutils-20010802-1\binutils binutils-2.11.2\binutils >binutils.diff

gives a 328292 bytes diff. It is without comparison of other subdirectories.

Am I doing something wrong?
--
Dmitry.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/