Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 11:17:05 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Cc: dmitry AT baikal DOT ru Subject: Re: binutils is no longer experimental Message-ID: <20010808111705.E4406@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, dmitry AT baikal DOT ru References: <20010807163431 DOT A31008 AT redhat DOT com> <011f01c11fd7$a18a9c50$cd823bd5 AT dmitry> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <011f01c11fd7$a18a9c50$cd823bd5@dmitry>; from dmitry@baikal.ru on Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 02:58:01PM +0800 On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 02:58:01PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: >"Christopher Faylor" wrote: > >> I got enough reports from trustworthy people to move the binutils cygwin >> release from "experimental" to "current". > >Hello Christopher. > >On 18 May 2001 I had sent the attached patch to a binutils mailing list. >DJ Delorie had approved my patch, but it never was commited. I suspect >that it wasn't because I had made diff against binutils-20010425-2 provided >by Cygwin and that diff could not be cleanly applied to a raw binutils cvs. If DJ approved the patch then he should commit it. I would just ping DJ. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/