Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2001 19:27:00 -0700 From: Wesel Subject: Re: SIGILL with pthreads and sockets To: Christopher Faylor Message-id: <3B6CAEF4.9C4BA335@pacbell.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en,ja References: <3B6CA668 DOT 86B5E8C0 AT pacbell DOT net> <20010804214013 DOT A6442 AT redhat DOT com> Christopher Faylor wrote: > > I may be wrong but I think it is unlikely that anyone is going to be willing > to debug a program of this size. Yes, I was afraid of that. I've been pruning it for a month now, trying to get it down to a reasonable size. > > If you can get this down to a simpler test case it will be much more likely to > be investigated. Would you believe it's about a fourth the size of the full program? :/ I'll try to cut it down more then... the problem only comes up when I combine sockets and pthreads, both of which take a lot of code to handle. I'm not sure exactly what I can eliminate yet. Thanks for the speedy reply! Wesel Who still isn't completely set up for this mailing list, so please ignore any transient header manipulations. -- Please do not feed me Twinkies -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/