Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <68C4CF842BD2D411AC1600902740B6DA0111154F@mcoexc02.mlm.maxtor.com> From: "Schumacher, Gordon" To: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" Subject: GCC configure broken on my system Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:07:47 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I have a W2K system with the CygWin tools on it. I'm trying to compile GCC, and I can't get either 2.95 or 3.00 to go This is what I'm doing: cd /usr/src tar xvfz gcc- mkdir gccobj cd gccobj ../gcc-/configure What I get in response to this last is: Configuring for a i686-pc-cygwin32 host. Created "Makefile" in /usr/src/gccobj using "mh-frag" Assembler messages: Error: Can't open /tmp/cci95BX8.s for reading. /tmp/cci95BX8.s: No such file or directory (ENOENT) *** The command 'gcc -o conftest -O2 conftest.c' failed. *** You must set the environment variable CC to a working compiler. As I said, I get much the same response from both 2.95 and 3.0. I've already checked the obvious (to me) like file/dir permissions. I've tried running this as "myself" and as Administrator; this made no difference. I need to rebuild GCC because I want to use it as a cross-compiler. This has got to be something dumb I'm doing; everyone seems to be reporting success on compilation of even 3.0! Help, please...? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/