Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20010730115430.0226dbb8@pop.ma.ultranet.com> X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 11:56:34 -0400 To: "Noel L Yap" , cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" Subject: Re: chroot and mount question In-Reply-To: <85256A99.005558E7.00@nyc-ntgw-n01.ny.jpmorgan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 11:32 AM 7/30/2001, Noel L Yap wrote: >If I have the following mount structure: >d:\cygwin on / type user (binmode) >v: on /view type user (binmode) >d:\cygwin on /view/nyap-tig-du type user (binmode) >v:\nyap-tig-du on /view/nyap-tig-du/vobs type user (binmode) > >and the following directory structure: >/ >/cygwin >/cygwin/bin >/view >/view/view0 >/view/view0/vobs >/view/view0/vobs/vob0 >/vobs >/vobs/vob1 > >what should the behaviour of: > chroot /view/view0 > ls /vobs > >be? > >I'm hoping the answer would be: > vob0 > >but what I'm getting is: > vob1 > >Is this correct behaviour (I haven't found any docs on this situation)? What you document is entirely correct and quite logical AFAICS. Now, if you typed "ls vobs" rather than "ls /vobs" and got the same result, that would be incorrect I believe. Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/