Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 23:28:59 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin Subject: Re: Anybody really runs sshd in win2K? Message-ID: <20010727232859.Z490@cygbert.vinschen.de> Mail-Followup-To: cygwin References: <996253216 DOT 3b619e202e689 AT grad DOT icmc DOT sc DOT usp DOT br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from prentis@aol.net on Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 01:17:54PM -0400 On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 01:17:54PM -0400, Prentis Brooks wrote: > Corrina correct me if I am wrong, but I thought sshd uses the native NT > passwords and not /etc/passwd. Please forgive me since I am coming back from > a rather long hiatus, has this changed since I last looked? Do /etc/passwd > entries take priority over the windows SAM DB? Your first idea was completely ok. On NT/W2K the NT password is used. You can change or add passwords to /etc/passwd in great profusion without success. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/