Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:21:54 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: TCP Wrappers Port Message-ID: <20010727122154.G3518@redhat.com> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20010727174811 DOT C9116 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: ; from khan@NanoTech.Wisc.EDU on Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 11:16:45AM -0500 On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 11:16:45AM -0500, Mumit Khan wrote: >On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 09:36:55AM -0400, Prentis Brooks wrote: >> > I am willing to take that on. Mumit's patch does fix the issue, I did not >> > realize that sys_nerr and sys_errlist were managed by _sys_nerr and >> > _sys_errlist in cygwin. Just a quick question, but where is that sort of >> > thing documented, in the API docs? Once I know where to look for that stuff, >> >> Actually I don't even know why the stuff begins with undersores. > >It's an unfortunate decision that makes life unnecessarily harder for >existing code. New code of course should be using strerror() etc instead >of looking inside sys_errlist, sys_nerr etc, but there's lots of legacy >systems which lack strerror() interface. Why don't we add the non-underscore versions, then? It sounds like that would solve some problems. I believe that the reason for the underscores is because that is the way MSVC does it. I don't know why someone decided that was what cygwin should do, too. It makes no sense to me. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/