Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <01C11640.55A550A0.jorgens@coho.net> From: Steve Jorgensen Reply-To: "jorgens AT coho DOT net" To: "cygwin AT cygwin. Com (E-mail)" Subject: Understanding Cygwin /etc/passwd and /etc/group on W98 Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 02:03:20 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Windows 98, I'm curious why /etc/group looks like an exact copy of /etc/passwd. they both look like this: Syhome::500:544::/home/Syhome:/bin/bash Shouldn't /etc/group contain an entry for a group with GID of 544 to match the default GID for UID 500 rather than a copy of the passwd file? FWIU, when looked at as passwd entry, this refers to a user with UID 500 and default group GID 544, but as a group entry, this defines a group with GID 500 having a single member UID 544. Since there is neither a UID of 544 or a GID of 500, these files don't look compatible. I see that if I run mkgroup, I get an entry that looks valid: unknown::544: but I thought setup created /etc/group by running mkgroup, so why isn't that what /etc/group already contains? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/