Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Message-ID: <3B5EED45.2030109@ece.gatech.edu> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:01:09 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010713 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Fortin CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: is cygwin lame??? References: <034601c11505$0a368710$6d07a8c0 AT miro> <001d01c1151e$aa4b7a80$47a23209 AT fishkill DOT ibm DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit John, Chill, dude. Sure, Michael's subject line is less-than-inspiring, but the message content was thorough, showed that he has researched his performance problem, and pinpointed the cause. I'll trade that for a "nice" subject line+clueless message body ANY day. If he'd also been able to include a patch to fix the problem, I'd probably wet my pants. [:-)] --Chuck BTW, why'd did you BCC: the cygwin list? Blind copying makes it hard to keep message threads/replies on-list; requires manual intervention of prospective reply-ees. (and it's been so long since I actually *initiated* a thread, I typed the cgywin mailing address in wrong the first time...) John Fortin wrote: > Hmmm, I am assuming that based on the subject your purpose was to > enflame the passions of people who use cygwin everyday. > If this was supposed to be a request for information, you style > leaves a bit to be desired. > ...Or your manners stopped evolving when you were ten. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/